Dangerous Speech: A Cross-Cultural Study of Dehumanization and Revenge
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract Dehumanization is routinely invoked in social science and law as the primary factor explaining how propaganda encourages support for, or participation in, violence against targeted outgroups. Yet primacy of dehumanization increasingly challenged by apparent influence revenge on collective violence. This study examines critically various audiences. Although previous research stresses dangers dehumanizing propaganda, a recently published found that only significantly lowered outgroup empathy. Given importance these findings for behavioral sciences, this augments recent with two additional samples were culturally distinct from prior findings, showing again was significant. To explore effect further, we also conducted facial electromyography (fEMG) among small set participants, finding triggered stronger negative emotions outgroups than dehumanization.
منابع مشابه
a frame semantic approach to the study of translating cultural scripts in salingers franny and zooey
the frame semantic theory is a nascent approach in the area of translation studies which goes beyond the linguistic barriers and helps us to incorporate cognitive and cultural factors to the study of translation. based on rojos analytical model (2002b), which centered in the frames or knowledge structures activated in the text, the present research explores the various translation problems that...
15 صفحه اولA cross-cultural study of request speech act: Iraqi and Malay students
Several studies have indicated that the range and linguistics expressions of external modifiers available in one language differ from those available in another language. The present study aims to investigate the cross-cultural differences and similarities with regards to the realization of request external modifications. To this end, 30 Iraqi and 30 Malay u...
متن کاملepistemic modality in english and persian academic writing: a cross-linguistic study of genre on the notion of transfer
چکیده حیطه ی نوشتار دانشگاهی اخیرا شاهد تغییرات عمده ای از غیرشخصی بودن (عینی بودن) به شخصی بودن بوده است. شخصی بودن متون دانشگاهی اهمیت استفاده از وجهیت معرفتی را برجسته می سازد چرا که? وجهیت معرفتی? بر اساس یکی از تعاریف ارائه شده از این مقوله? ارتباط تنگاتنگی با شخصی بودن داشته و به عنوان بیان نظر شخصی گوینده در مورد جز گزاره ای گفته در نظر گرفته میشود. بنابراین? با در نظر داشتن نقاط مشترک...
15 صفحه اولA Cross-linguistic and Cross-cultural Study of Epistemic Modality Markers in Linguistics Research Articles
Epistemic modality devices are believed to be one of the prominent characteristics of research articles as the commonly used genre among the academic community members. Considering the importance of such devices in producing and comprehending scientific discourse, this study aimed to cross–culturally and cross-linguistically investigate epistemic modality markers as an important subcategory...
متن کاملa comparative pragmatic analysis of the speech act of “disagreement” across english and persian
the speech act of disagreement has been one of the speech acts that has received the least attention in the field of pragmatics. this study investigates the ways power relations, social distance, formality of the context, gender, and language proficiency (for efl learners) influence disagreement and politeness strategies. the participants of the study were 200 male and female native persian s...
15 صفحه اولذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Cognition and Culture
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['1568-5373', '1567-7095']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12340157